TIB Rejects Government Criticism Over Crime Report Methodology
Photo Collected
Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) has formally rejected claims by the Home Minister and police authorities that its recent report on the state of law and order is based solely on newspaper clippings, characterizing the government’s rebuttal as an attempt to evade the substance of its findings. The organization’s response comes in the wake of a TIB study covering the first 100 days of the current administration, which documented 605 murders, 3,496 instances of violence against women and children, 196 abductions, and 294 muggings.
Following the release of the findings last Sunday, independent lawmaker Rumin Farhana cited the report in Parliament to highlight concerns regarding deteriorating security. Home Minister Salauddin Ahmed dismissed the report, asserting that TIB relies on media reports rather than conducting independent investigations, a sentiment echoed by police headquarters, which questioned the methodology behind the presented statistics.
বিজ্ঞাপন
In a press statement issued Tuesday, TIB clarified its role as a research-driven advocacy organization focused on anti-corruption and good governance, noting that it does not claim to be an investigative law enforcement agency. The organization defended its methodology, stating that it employs rigorous, internationally recognized quantitative and qualitative social science research techniques to collect and verify data from diverse sources.
TIB maintained that while it does incorporate media reports, these are subjected to a multi-layered verification process and cross-referenced against governmental, private, and field-level data to ensure accuracy. The group argued that labeling their work as mere clippings-based reporting is not only factually unfounded but also a tactic to deflect from the underlying issues regarding national security.
বিজ্ঞাপন
The organization further challenged the government’s disparagement of media-sourced data, pointing out that state institutions frequently rely on such information to inform policy decisions. TIB questioned why the administration would discredit data sources that it routinely utilizes itself.
Regarding the response from the police, TIB observed that the authorities did not explicitly dispute the core observation that the current law and order situation is concerning. While police officials suggested a need for comparative analysis with previous administrations, TIB clarified that such longitudinal comparisons fell outside the specific scope of this 100-day research study, rendering the criticism regarding methodology irrelevant to the report’s primary conclusions.
0%
0%
0%
0%
